Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Mimi's avatar

I understand your disgust, but your rant is difficult to read. The flood gates protecting reasonableness opened long ago, and this is what we get: chaos. To condemn and ridicule with condescending words, attacking character and slander, is an attempt to silence that which embarrasses. That sensitivity is long gone! It seems the big issue is disenfranchisement, ie., go away, be quiet, stay in your place, your rights don’t matter. Status quo. No voice. Shut up and be quiet. Give in. Right or wrong, this movement is going for something, anything, to show it’s alive, strong and kicking and still has a voice.

Expand full comment
Joanne Smalley's avatar

For over 200 years, this Nation has peacefully (well, except for that little skirmish in 1861-1865) seen the transition of power from one political party to another. Now, because of Trump’s inability to accept the reality that he lost and a Republican Party too cowardly to tell a delusional president that he lost, we are entering a period when no candidate for public office will accept a loss. If the candidate loses, the election must be fixed. To be sure, Trump is not the first to pull such a stunt. In 2000, Gore had difficulty accepting that reality. He did ultimately and reluctantly concede on December 13, 2000. Just two years ago, Stacy Abrams refused to accept that she had lost the Governor’s race to Brian Kemp. I don’t believe she ever conceded. This type of behavior is extremely damaging to the nation and endangers our Republic. It doesn’t help matters that the last two presidential election cycles saw the worse candidates from both parties vying for the most powerful position in the nation (arguably, even in the world). Maybe it’s time to re-visit the Presidential Primary System. Is it really better than a candidate being chosen by his or her party at a national convention?

Expand full comment
13 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?