I hope you noticed what happened this past weekend.
As a potential coup raged in Russia, it was hard to find reliable information about it. Under Elon Musk, Twitter has wiped out the reliability of verified accounts. As the Russians eliminated all their independent media accounts in the past few years, Twitter became a reliable source of information.
For all the problems I and others have had with Twitter’s heavy-handed leftwing management and biases, the site did a pretty good job of using the blue checkmark only for legitimate voices.
In the past ninety-six hours, a bunch of troll accounts that paid for blue checkmarks circulated all sorts of mostly false and unreliable information. The world went to Twitter to find out what was happening in Russia, and both Wagner and Putin trolls combated each other and pushed fake news.
It was very hard to determine what was actually happening in Russia.
Concurrently, it has been hard to avoid noticing David Sacks and Elon Musk taking a very pro-Putin and anti-Ukraine line on Twitter. Ukraine is a country that Russia invaded on its own. It is remarkable to see how these men and others have served as apologists for Putin’s regime against an innocent people — including near echos of anti-American propaganda to justify Putin’s invasion and surrender of Ukrainian sovereignty.
I’d note that, under your leadership, Meta has refused to do business with the Communist Chinese and has refused to operate servers in China. When Hong Kong’s sovereignty was finally extinguished, it was great to see Meta refuse to collaborate with or aid the People’s Liberation Army in their efforts to track down and arrest dissidents who had used Meta’s platform in China.
Meanwhile, Elon Musk strives to do business in China and has repeatedly placated the Chinese authorities. One might conclude that his anti-vaccine, anti-Biden antics on Twitter are to distract conservatives from how pro-authoritarian Musk has become, particularly regarding China and Russia.
I have concerns that Meta, like Twitter pre-Musk, will treat truthful conservatives harshly. One should be able to point out that Ellen Page, not Elliott Page, acted in the movie Juno. One should be able to say the Assistant Secretary of Health and Human Services is a biological male.
Pre-Musk, Twitter was a bastion of progressive groupthink in its application of rules and its biases. Even now, I think Meta had good intentions to outsource fact-checking to independent groups, but progressives have gamed the system and fostered a bias not towards actual truth but progressive groupthink in Facebook’s system.
I hope that as Threads comes online, Meta will allow it to be a source of information without censorship catering towards leftwing shibboleths on sex and gender, etc. But I also hope Meta will recognize that for the truth to flourish, the blue checkmarks can't go to the highest bidder but should go to the advocates of real news and truth.
There is a way to find a balance. Elon Musk and pre-Musk Twitter never found the balance. I hope, as Threads goes live, you will. The world needs a social media platform that can handle differences of opinion fairly — but a platform that can also promote actual truth over lies. Elon Musk has so far failed. Surely, Mark, you can do better.
I hope you will. This past weekend shows just how needed a site like Twitter is, without Musk’s and pre-Musk Twitter’s nonsense and biases for various authoritarians.
I will defer to Mr. Erickson as to how much Elon Musk is parroting pro-Putin and anti-Ukraine talking points. While there are many political leaders in Ukraine that support Russia, it seems that many in Ukraine (including many leaders) want to align with the west. So, while I certainly want to be good stewards with our money, I think pro-western Ukrainians deserve our support.
Having admitted that about myself, I would like to say that there are many Americans on the right who are so opposed to anything Biden is doing that they will come close to echoing those same talking points that Musk promotes. They even act like fiscal hawks when I know for a fact they never cared about national debt in the past.
China has been running around the globe buying influence in Africa and South America (along with mines that yield the materials required for EV batteries). Meanwhile, we have been turning our backs on our allies and people who want to be closer to us all around that same globe.
Trump was very clear. He wanted us to not be engaged in anything outside our borders (slight exaggeration?). Think: Afghanistan, Syria, Iraq, Kurds.... The list goes on. By pulling back, America has created a vaccuum in the world. China is filling it. We will pay the price (think: Influence, battery materials, de-dollarization, etc.)
It's already very evident that Meta, and its component platforms, will not be an impartial manager of its content.
The fact that it punishes users without explaining exactly why they are being punished shows this to be true.