Democrats Claim Evidence the GOP is About to Steal 2022
Democrat Stacey Abrams has gone to law enforcement authorities. She claims she has detailed evidence of a Republican plot to suppress the 2022 election. She’s provided detailed technical information to the Georgia Bureau of Investigation outlining the plan. However, Vic Reynolds, the Kemp appointed head of the GBI has said there’s not enough evidence to pursue an investigation. In fact, he points out Abrams claims to have a witness, but is refusing to hand over the witness for interviews. For her part, Abrams says the witness is afraid of harassment by Republicans. Consequently, the Georgia Election Board has issued a subpoena demanding a private interview with the witness. But Abrams’ group is still refusing to cooperate and dragging its feet.
Pretty suspicious right? Probably lacks any credibility right? Abrams actually is even taking credit for solving a murder. An 8-year-old was murdered in Atlanta last year. Abrams says the data she has that shows the GOP is going to steal the election is so technically precise that it was even used to solve that murder. The problem is Abrams says she handed over the information in October of 2021, but not only is there no evidence, the murderers had been arrested two months earlier.
Scam? Nonsense? Progressive hysteria? Actually, I’m not talking about Stacey Abrams at all, but the wild propaganda in 2000 Mules. It is bull crap that some people are just desperate to believe. Take a listen.
I hate the narrative of a stolen election, but the GOP needs to build a reputation as the party that takes election security seriously.
My understanding is the subpoena has been issued but the witness is not scared only of being doxxed, but of being prosecuted for their involvement in numerous felonies.
It is also my understanding that state knows that over 1,600 non-citizens attempted to register to vote, a felony under state law. Because the state knows who these individuals are, there are calls to investigate if any groups encouraged or paid these individuals to attempt to register. And with Dems in the state trying to remove the legal requirement to prove citizenship in order to register to vote...this seems like a relevant issue.
Again, I think it is possible to avoid "stolen election" rhetoric while also taking allegations of fraud seriously. As conservatives that generally distrust the government and their ability to competently perform many roles...why would it surprise anyone that investigations into fraud would have to originate outside of government. The same government that has a vested interest in minimizing allegations of fraud and patting themselves on the back for the most secure election in history.
Here's the problem. When you mix 'fact based' evidence in with theory or even stretch past theory, you lose your credibility. And that's what tends to happen to these groups. Have no doubt that the left does the same thing. Some things are fact, but then the 'crazy' starts and (speaking for me only) see the crazy and tend to push away where there actually might be something to pay attention to.
There are few people that in the business that Erick is in that I trust and as Neil Boortz always says, "check what I'm saying, to make sure I'm telling you the truth". In other words, don't get lazy. I believe that Erick does his very best to stay between the lines, so if he misses a couple along the way, I'm good with that. If I want to dig deeper; I dig deeper. We all should.
His show is a valuable resource, but only one resource. None of us should get lazy. Erick might hit the lottery and go hit golf balls and drink cigars every day. Then what would we do? :)