Palin v The New York Times
A judge dismissed Sarah Palin’s defamation suit against The New York Times. The Times admitted fault but claimed it was unintentional.
The case stems from claims in a 2017 New York Times editorial that linked Palin to the 2011 mass shooting involving Gabby Giffords. Essentially, the judge claimed that Palin’s team was unable to prove actual malice by The Times. This ruling is significant but there’s a larger matter with The Times that we need to discuss. Let me explain:
Yep, I remember that movie, "Absence of Malice" - ruining reputations, lives without being accountable especially when proven to be wrong. Life imitating art...