A hot mic moment between Kamala Harris and Gretchen Whitmer over the weekend confirmed what all of us knew: Democrats are failing to connect with male voters and are worried it may swing the election.
Michelle is a multimillionaire and this voting year would never affect her health in any way and Barack can still blow smoke up the young men’s tails but it won’t matter because they don’t matter.
This wanker ad, and the Michelle Obama-organized campaign tour featuring drag queens and slut-singer Lizzo ... if the Dem strategists have correctly identified their demographic, our culture is at serious risk.
This is no "head scratching closing message from the Harris campaign." Right there at the end of the ad, the caption says, "NOT AUTHORIZED BY ANY CANDIDATE OR CANDIDATE'S COMMITTEE."
Erick, I value your opinion because you are one of the few Republicans supporting Trump who have any integrity, but this is the sort of thing that is typical of Fox News: accurate information presented in a way that leads to inaccurate conclusions. You're better than this.
There is no memo from Obama to Lois Lerner telling her to weaponoze the IRS against conservative organizations. She knew what her boss wanted and acted accordingly.
Neither Gillette nor Bud Lite were running political ads, but they were politically motivated ads acquiescing to the progressive Left's narrative and world view.
Kamala is trying to buy votes with marijuana. The Obama's are lecturing men. Progressive Karens badger, berate, and belittle men.
While true the ad is not endorsed by Kamala it is absolutely in line with her campaign and and the progressive Left's view of men.
So, the party of marvelous collective political coordination… where every Democrat and Democrat supporter that is a comrade member of the political chattering class including the network of NGOs, all get the same talking points memo and any that step out of line are attacked and crushed… and now we are to believe that there are rogue factions putting out advertising harmful to the Harris campaign without Harris campaign approval? Right.
DEFEND THE VOTE is an organization to support progressive sources and align Ed with left and far left organizations - this is not trolling by Republicans, this is the left attempting to convince young men to abandon any inclinations to vote Republican
No inaccurate conclusions? LMAO! SuperPAC or campaign ad, to voters it's a distinction without a difference. Only a prig would think (or care) otherwise.
I do. They are prohibited from coordinating their activities with the candidates they support.
Harris/Walz had nothing to do with this. Indeed, the actual sponsors of this ad could even be trying to sabotage her campaign with the implication that it came for her.
If you took time to check the group that paid for the ad, it a progressive / far left group that has a distorted view of how to convince young voters to Trump. It is your uniformed speculative guess which obviously fits your narrative that is misleadingly inaccurate. These are far left Dems.
Thanks to Build Back Better and the Biden Economy, men can’t afford to wine and dine a woman and establish a relationship leading to adult delights. Men are forced to use porn to pleasure themselves. (Sarcasm).
My stepson is 18 years old. He will be voting for the first time. After he saw this "wanker" ad, he thought for a minute, and then said: "It's pretty sad that Kamala Harris thinks so little of men my age, yet she expects my vote".
If truth still matters to you, you might want to bring to your stepson's attention the caption at the conclusion of the ad, which reads "NOT AUTHORIZED BY ANY CANDIDATE OR CANDIDATE'S COMMITTEE."
Harris/Walz had nothing to do with this. Indeed, the actual sponsors of this ad could even be trying to sabotage her campaign with the implication that it came for her.
To be fair, I will point that out to him. The group who put it out is a left-wing organization though... and honestly, I haven't heard any Republican running on banning porn. Such
a thing is unconstitutional and would never survive a court challenge anyhow.
I would genuinely hate to think that any young men, or older ones for that matter, would look at that ad and decide that Harris is the person to vote for. If so, we have completely gone down the drain. A more gross and disgusting ad has never been made.
Michelle is a multimillionaire and this voting year would never affect her health in any way and Barack can still blow smoke up the young men’s tails but it won’t matter because they don’t matter.
This wanker ad, and the Michelle Obama-organized campaign tour featuring drag queens and slut-singer Lizzo ... if the Dem strategists have correctly identified their demographic, our culture is at serious risk.
Didn't Algore's wife have a problem with Cyndi Lauper's "She Bop" and Prince's "Darling Nikki"?
Why yes, she did.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Parents_Music_Resource_Center#Filthy_Fifteen
This is no "head scratching closing message from the Harris campaign." Right there at the end of the ad, the caption says, "NOT AUTHORIZED BY ANY CANDIDATE OR CANDIDATE'S COMMITTEE."
Erick, I value your opinion because you are one of the few Republicans supporting Trump who have any integrity, but this is the sort of thing that is typical of Fox News: accurate information presented in a way that leads to inaccurate conclusions. You're better than this.
He "eats your soul, in small bites."
There is no memo from Obama to Lois Lerner telling her to weaponoze the IRS against conservative organizations. She knew what her boss wanted and acted accordingly.
Neither Gillette nor Bud Lite were running political ads, but they were politically motivated ads acquiescing to the progressive Left's narrative and world view.
Kamala is trying to buy votes with marijuana. The Obama's are lecturing men. Progressive Karens badger, berate, and belittle men.
While true the ad is not endorsed by Kamala it is absolutely in line with her campaign and and the progressive Left's view of men.
Weinstein and Epstein were Democrats.
So, the party of marvelous collective political coordination… where every Democrat and Democrat supporter that is a comrade member of the political chattering class including the network of NGOs, all get the same talking points memo and any that step out of line are attacked and crushed… and now we are to believe that there are rogue factions putting out advertising harmful to the Harris campaign without Harris campaign approval? Right.
Right.
The 30 second ad title is "Republicans Rubbing You The Wrong Way" paid for by "Progress Action Fund" and "Defend The Vote."
DEFEND THE VOTE is an organization to support progressive sources and align Ed with left and far left organizations - this is not trolling by Republicans, this is the left attempting to convince young men to abandon any inclinations to vote Republican
No inaccurate conclusions? LMAO! SuperPAC or campaign ad, to voters it's a distinction without a difference. Only a prig would think (or care) otherwise.
You DO know how PACs work, right?
I do. They are prohibited from coordinating their activities with the candidates they support.
Harris/Walz had nothing to do with this. Indeed, the actual sponsors of this ad could even be trying to sabotage her campaign with the implication that it came for her.
If you took time to check the group that paid for the ad, it a progressive / far left group that has a distorted view of how to convince young voters to Trump. It is your uniformed speculative guess which obviously fits your narrative that is misleadingly inaccurate. These are far left Dems.
Thanks to Build Back Better and the Biden Economy, men can’t afford to wine and dine a woman and establish a relationship leading to adult delights. Men are forced to use porn to pleasure themselves. (Sarcasm).
My stepson is 18 years old. He will be voting for the first time. After he saw this "wanker" ad, he thought for a minute, and then said: "It's pretty sad that Kamala Harris thinks so little of men my age, yet she expects my vote".
If truth still matters to you, you might want to bring to your stepson's attention the caption at the conclusion of the ad, which reads "NOT AUTHORIZED BY ANY CANDIDATE OR CANDIDATE'S COMMITTEE."
Harris/Walz had nothing to do with this. Indeed, the actual sponsors of this ad could even be trying to sabotage her campaign with the implication that it came for her.
To be fair, I will point that out to him. The group who put it out is a left-wing organization though... and honestly, I haven't heard any Republican running on banning porn. Such
a thing is unconstitutional and would never survive a court challenge anyhow.
Will the target audience for that ad be willing to give it up long enough to stand in line to vote?
It's doubtful they've even registered to vote, since their hands and eyes are too busy to fill out a voter registration application
Anyone notice how when Kamala takes a sip of beer she nearly gags on it? And this is a woman with no gag reflex due to years of practice...
Interesting.... I gag whenever I hear her speak.
Good one.
That ad is disgusting!
I would genuinely hate to think that any young men, or older ones for that matter, would look at that ad and decide that Harris is the person to vote for. If so, we have completely gone down the drain. A more gross and disgusting ad has never been made.
The Harris campaign is so out of touch with what is going on in this country. Harris and Whitmer are just despicable.
My gay co worker just pisses off Michelle he voted Trump today via mail in ballot because his pay check was 25% less than it was before 2021
I wonder if the Harris campaign will be used as a case study for future campaigns.
“See this campaign? Don’t do that.”
Damn, Erick! Stop emailing me while I am trying to watch porn!
Now that was funny.
And liberals love Collin Jost and Michael Che on SNL.
Pathetic.