Do you dispute my claim that Raffensperger and the election officials involved have a lot to lose if extensive fraud is found, as at a minimum it would suggest they were incapable of running a fair election. If so, should they not legitimately excuse themselves from evaluating fraud claims to allow an independent investigation? If not, w…
Do you dispute my claim that Raffensperger and the election officials involved have a lot to lose if extensive fraud is found, as at a minimum it would suggest they were incapable of running a fair election. If so, should they not legitimately excuse themselves from evaluating fraud claims to allow an independent investigation? If not, why not? This is not an argument that fraud was present. It is an argument that people responsible for ensuring large-scale fraud was not present should not be investigating (or preventing the investigation) of whether large-scale fraud was present.
Do you dispute my claim that Raffensperger and the election officials involved have a lot to lose if extensive fraud is found, as at a minimum it would suggest they were incapable of running a fair election. If so, should they not legitimately excuse themselves from evaluating fraud claims to allow an independent investigation? If not, why not? This is not an argument that fraud was present. It is an argument that people responsible for ensuring large-scale fraud was not present should not be investigating (or preventing the investigation) of whether large-scale fraud was present.