To the best of my knowledge, only the Pennsylvania case was decided on laches (unwarranted delay) grounds, and that is the case where the plaintiffs argued that they likely lacked standing prior to the election. In other states, I believe the election challenges were all rejected for lack of evidence.
To the best of my knowledge, only the Pennsylvania case was decided on laches (unwarranted delay) grounds, and that is the case where the plaintiffs argued that they likely lacked standing prior to the election. In other states, I believe the election challenges were all rejected for lack of evidence.
To the best of my knowledge, only the Pennsylvania case was decided on laches (unwarranted delay) grounds, and that is the case where the plaintiffs argued that they likely lacked standing prior to the election. In other states, I believe the election challenges were all rejected for lack of evidence.