20 Comments

Thanks for the lesson in reality. So, bottom line, we wait until Donald Trump dies or gets put in a nursing home. I was so looking forward to an attempt to take over the Libertarian Party.

Expand full comment

Thank you. When can people just get back to being, well "normal?" Stop looking for the elephant in the room that really isn't there? Third parties won't work. We have seen how third parties split votes and we end up with a worse situation. Please let's get back to some good old fashioned "common sense."

Expand full comment

Thanks. It's always helpful to read your perspective.

Expand full comment

Erick, in the hope that you might more readily take note of an individual post, I repeat here a point that I made in reply to another post because you need to fully understand what is at stake here. Concerning the rally where people pledged allegiance to an American flag that flew on January 6th, you characterized it as mere "nonsense" and "idol worship." Not being an anti-Semite, you would not recognize this as the dog whistle that it actually is for American Nazis.

(See https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blutfahne)

Expand full comment

The 'Underpants Gnome Party'

1. Elect our opponents

2. ?

3. Profit!

Expand full comment

I would love MOST of Trump's policies with a Reagan personality. Mr. T does bring out the worst in our opponents, and even worse to see is supposed "Republicans", in irrational antipathy for Trump and his fans--abandon Conservatism out of spite. McMullen, Kristol, Wilson, Dowd, Liz, etc. are useful idiots for the Left. What also bothers me is the arrogance of the Conservative Intelligentsia like Jonah. Even if Trump implemented EVERY policy they had promoted the last 20 years--they would still shun him. Primarily--I am guessing, because it is beneath them to ever link arms with a "simpleton". And, their intellectual peers, Right and Left, would mock them if they did agree with Trump. So, it is more of a class thing--not intellectual honesty.

Expand full comment

From the beginning of Trump until now, it has really been disheartening to see prominent Republicans refuse to take him on. And if one is not willing to do that, how can I trust him/her to lead the country? The world is a tough neighborhood. If, in the 1st debate, Cruz had stepped out from behind his place, walked over to DT, grabbed him by the lapels and told DT that he (i.e, Cruz) was going to beat the daylights out of him right there on the spot unless he (DT) withdrew what he'd said about Cruz's father, then I believe Cruz would be president today after a successful 1st term. But he didn't. And now? It's time for someone to step up or DT will cost Republicans lots of votes in 2022, seats in Congress, statehouses and the rest. You don't get rid of a bully by yielding to him.

Expand full comment

When you say, "take him on",...if you mean, take on Trump and shame his juvenile and boorish attacks on his enemies, I can go for that. BUT, take him on for policy issues?...I would be curious which ones you mean--because he was more Conservative in policy and judge appointments than W ever was, by a long shot.

Expand full comment

Fantastic piece, Erick! This is the one that finally turned me into a paid subscriber. I agree that you, Jonah, and Bill Kristol have all correctly diagnosed the issues correctly with the MAGAfied GOP but nobody has come up with the correct solution yet. Becoming a Democrat when the party is now hostile to non-progressives or joining a third party that will never win are both bad ideas for small-government conservatives who want to change the GOP. As you brilliantly stated about the first option, “Republicans who want to stop Trump must vote Democrat. . .this is like the climate change people saying if you want to stop climate changing, you need to commit suicide to stop your carbon emissions.” I just hope that your optimism that this too shall pass comes true sooner rather than later.

Expand full comment

Erick, you don't need to be in the Einsteinian league. You have a valuable niche of your own. You're still the only pundit I've read who emphasizes the need for us to show grace when our own allies let us down. We need that reminder.

Expand full comment

Who needs a third party? We have our Lord and Savior, Donald Trump. (As I bow in the direction of Mar-a-Logo and kiss the flag of the Jan.6 mob attack on the Capitol which used to represent the good old U.S.A.) "People Are Stupid"

Expand full comment

Uncletifa……OMGoodness that made me spit coffee through my nose 😂😂😂. Thank you Erick. This morning you did not disappoint. Moving forward my husband and I have decided we will only support local candidates financially. NO MORE FUNDS to State and National candidates. We want to take our community back. BTW, “uncletifa” reads like the name of a venereal disease. JS

Expand full comment

I purchased a subscription to your site in hopes of reading your periodic objective assessments of the current state of US politics rather than the routine rants against the Democrats that makes up most of your opinions. Today’s post is one of those objective gems I am always looking for. Thank you. You should copyright the new term “uncletifa.”

Expand full comment

I too subscribe for Erick's moments of objectivity, which have been few and far between unfortunatwly until today. I mostly agree with todays post except the part about a 3rd party not being possible. Anything is possible and Im not just throwing out cliches. There is now a space for a 3rd party, yes it may be difficult but it is a task worth undertaking. I know people see me on here all the time saying 3rd party now! And I mean it.. If not now, then when? This is the best chance for a true 3rd party to emerge if there ever was one. There are many many center left dems, especially blacks and minorities that are tired of being let down by them dems breaking promises, but most are NOT going to vote republican. Based on the history of how Republicans have treated minorities in general AND Trump.. You can say that isnt true or that it is perceived but perception is reality. These groups are not going to vote for a party led by Trump. They are not going to vote with a party with elements of far right extremism in it they need a viable alternative to the democrats that have disappointed for years and the far right that do not hold their best interests at heart. Most blacks are religious conservatives believe it or not, but vote for basically who is perceived to be less racist. Im not calling any racist, but for many blacks it comes down to the lesser of 2 evils, who is most likely to be less racist. No one says all Republicans are racist, but most racists are Republicans. Im just sharing the truth as we see it. Dont get mad im trying to inform. There is no better time than now for a 3rd party. With mostly objective common sense non-racist Republicans like Erick could help make it happen. 3rd party now! It's all about policy not personality!

Expand full comment

Ironic that Trump got the highest % of minority votes for any Republican Prez candidate since 1960. He reached out with actual beneficial policies for Blacks specifically than any Prez in the last 30 years.

Expand full comment

Crash, you hit the nail exactly, precisely on the head with this post. I am one of those center-left, black Democrats who is well aware that most Democratic politicians are completely full of it. The failures of their urban policies - meaning the failures of their policies for black folk - are too obvious for any honest person to deny. And you know what? I will NEVER vote for any Republican who has not clearly and unequivocally disavowed Donald Trump. Given the fact that no Republican can do that and still win the nomination of his party, what that means is that as of now, I will never vote for a Republican. NEVER.

Before Trump, I would usually end up splitting my ticket. In order to do so, however, I always had to look past the Republican Party's embrace of people who hate me. Crash could not have been more accurate in stating the crux of the matter: a Republican is not always a racist, but a racist is almost always a Republican. Crash was also right about black folk actually being more conservative than the general population on a great many policy matters. However, when you have a Republican speaking directly to those issues while pointing out the abject failure of Democratic policies, the effect is completely ruined by the Klansman he has standing next to him. And then, there are the dog whistles.

As you probably already know, a dog whistle has a pitch that humans cannot hear, but dogs can. Similarly, Republican campaigns have historically employed subtle messages that seem completely benign to people who are not racist. However, not only do the dogs (racists) hear them clearly, so do the dogs' quarry (us). There is no more perfect illustration of my point than Erick's characterization of the rally where people pledged allegiance to an American flag that flew on January 6th, as "nonsense" and "idol worship." Not being an anti-Semite, Erick would have no clue regarding its real significance. However, I guarantee you that American Nazis recognize a Blutfahne (blood flag) when they see one. (See https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blutfahne) And so do Jews.

When I first heard rumblings about the formation of a third party consisting of anti-Trump Republicans, I COULD NOT WAIT to sign up. The prospect of helping to build a conservative party where racists and nutjobs are not welcome made my heart race. However, also having a background in election law, I can tell you that Erick is right about the deck being completely stacked against the formation of third parties.

So here, we have a real dilemma. But that dilemma only concerns the means by which a certain goal is to be accomplished; about which goal there should be no uncertainty. Whether by a third party siphoning off votes or right-thinking Republicans simply voting Democratic, THIS Republican Party has got to start losing a lot of elections.

If you have any doubt about this and what is at stake, just remember that the Blutfahne now has a home in America.

Expand full comment

Why don't we just hold our Republican "so-called" representatives accountable. Have them speak out on how they stand on issues; call out Democrats or the news media when they don't tell the truth. Stop asking me for money when I don't know who you are or can't find you cowering in the corner. We need Republican leaders (McCarthy and McConnell) who WILL bring their members up front to speak out and condemn lies. There are only a few standing up for us. I'm not hearing them condemn CRT or praise our police and definitely don't hear much on the invasion of our border from them and how it will be a burden on the middleclass. Also, they should be going into our inner cities and speak about the only way out of poverty is education - give parents School Choice and ask what have Democrats done for you and ASK FOR AN ANSWER. SILENCE!

Expand full comment

Whether this third party comes into being or not, the end result is much the same -its candidate pulls enough from the GOP that they lose or, without said third party candidate, conservatives vote for the Democrat. Democrat wins.

This is the case unless enough of the existing parties mass switches to the third party. Creating such a party is unlikely.

On another note, Erick, I didn't think you'd top coining the name Woke o Haram...but Uncletifa is brilliant, too.

Expand full comment

Jonah Goldberg also observes that both parties want to be minority parties. And, I think he’s onto something. As you state, the “Uncletifa” can lose and then continue to claim the 2020 election was stolen. They can also continue to cite their other grievances; e.g., white discrimination, etc. The same seems true of “The Squad” and their ilk. They appear on a path designed to turn moderates against them because of rigid requirement of radical policies. But, once out of the majority, they can return to complaining about injustice, rather than doing something about it, which is where they seem most comfortable. Governing is hard, and neither side seems to want to do it.

Expand full comment

A third party won't work, but maybe a fourth party will. Splintering off one of the parties will certainly cause that splintered party to lose. Splinter off both parties...and maybe there will be enough parity that it could work.

I think a better solution would be to have a media that reports the facts, and doesn't try to follow some set of talking points or "mostly peaceful" BS.

If the media was factual, believable, possibly people could make rational decisions...though I fear rationality left with social media.

Expand full comment