Update: Don’t believe me, here’s the actual explanation of what’s going on by the Secretary of State’s office, the monitor who was present, etc. Let’s discuss the video. I know I won’t change your mind. I don’t care about that. I care about the truth. What is truth? It is not what you think, but what is.
A couple simple questions? Why were the suitcases stored under the table (out of sight)? That same table-top was totally unused....why not were the suitcases stored on the table-top? Why were the suitcases (under the table) only removed after most of the observers were "sent" home. These are simple questions. There may be a perfectly reasonable explanation but your explanation sounds like it's coming from a person who just wants to sweep this under the rug as fast as possible. But, Erick, it just doesn't smell right. You know Erick, I got a little skeptical of you after I heard that "powder-puff" interview you had with the Sec of State Raffensberger....you gave him a complete pass on that one. "Facts" do matter to me....but I don't think it's quite over yet. We'll see
They have an affidavit from one of the watchers that said they were all told to leave and that she was upset to hear from someone at the venue said they were still working. It was mentioned in the beginning of the hearing.
Thanks Erick for clarifying what was going on that night. Just watching the video freaked me out but your explanation helped calm my fears. As a Georgia voter, I have been begging my friends to NOT watch or listen to any of this election coverage cuz we all need to focus on the runoff election! The thought of the Senate also in Democrat hands scares me. The Democrats are so full of hate for anything and anyone Trump, all the good Trump has done for the country will be trashed and I can't afford more Obama policies! Thanks for keeping me sane!
Enough has been exposed across the nation for me to conclude that Democrat leadership purposefully orchestrated a massive voter fraud campaign in swing states. The video you posted may or may not expose a particular incident of fraud, but in the aggregate across the nation the incidents brought to light are enough to nullify the election. I hold with the "fraud vitiates everything" Supreme Court precedent as applicable to this year's election. No do-over! Trump won by default!
In the video she asked why the ballots were under the table separate from the other ballots and pulled out when most people left. I would like to know. I’m not stuck on the election was stolen, but could you help me understand why the republicans let Stacy Abrahms register 800,000 new voters and not at least do the same thing? Who was asleep at the wheel ? Someone had to notice the newly registered Democrats right?
This is who Trump always was: an immoral man, willing to lie about any and all things to benefit himself, irrespective of the impact on others or the country. The man you supported for president.
I can't dispute your analysis of the video. This one makes no more sense to me than any of the others floating around. What I do dispute is the notion that too little wrongdoing was perpetrated to change the outcome. You cannot tell me that even if anything wrong happened, it was too little to matter. Wrongdoing is wrong, and it should be identified, punished, and prevented from happening in the future.
My point is that the election process should be known to us all. There should be no secrets about the way the election operates. People whose job is to observe what goes on should be as close to the process as they need to be in order to see what goes on. Everything that happens should be open to observation, and both the processors and the observers to the process should agree on what happened.
The problem is that unless we know that the process is completely visible and honest, we cannot know if some observed wrongdoing is an anomaly or a practice. As voters, we must be able to trust the process to record what voters actually voted. It is all a very complicated, expensive, unfunny joke if nobody can say with confidence, the voters chose this candidate.
I agree that it is possible that too little wrongdoing occurred to change the election outcome. However, any wrongdoing is still wrong, and until we chase it all to ground, we cannot know who was actually elected.
In essence, your argument seems to be that since insufficient signature verification was done (your words: "[the Georgia GOP] could have fought to observe the signature verification process; and they could have demanded to stay and observe that night, but they didn’t.") that is justification for not doing a signature audit now to independently verify its accuracy. That puts your position in opposition to Governor Kemp, Senators Loeffler and Perdue and Congressmen Collins. The purpose of an audit is to verify the truth and if the portion of the GA-GOP that you seem to seek to speak for is against doing that, then that portion of the GA-GOP stands in opposition to what the vast majority of the GOP seek (i.e. the truth). Trump's position is in line with Kemp, Loeffer, Perdue, and Collins, in arguing for all GOP members to vote for Loeffler/Perdue, but also do the signature verification audit: "The best way to insure a @KLoeffler and @sendavidperdue VICTORY is to allow signature checks in the Presidential race, which will insure a Georgia Presidential win (very few votes are needed, many will be found). Spirits will soar and everyone will rush out and VOTE!"
The way you find the truth about such matters is in unbiased courts of law that allow evidence to be presented and witnesses to testify and be cross examined. That is what responsible GOP members advocate for, with this procedure expressed in a set of Kurt Schlichter's tweets regarding the video: "Exactly. Videotape is a great type of evidence, but it is meaningless without getting the context through sworn testimony. We all want the truth. That’s how you find the truth. We shouldn’t be afraid of that. We should celebrate it. .. I want to see more facts about what this actually means, but this demonstrates why it is important to litigate these matters all the way to a final resolution. We must get the evidence out there. ... The same way you try and find the truth in any trial. You cross examine the witness. People lie all the time. I know - I’m a lawyer."
You may be willing to place your trust in Raffensperger, but quite a few people in the GOP would prefer an independent examination of the evidence to verify what the truth is. Isn't that what "Quid ed veritas" seeks? The quest to verify the truth has nothing at all to do with not voting for Loeffler and Perdue, as anybody who is truly a Trump supporter will clearly follow his guidance and vote GOP.
I will be voting at the Sandy Springs library December 14 at 7am. I urge you to do the same at your polling place. There is no need to vote by paper mail in ballot. No need at all. We have a vaccine, therapeutics can be given if you contract Covid, hospitalizations in Georgia are down, plenty of beds if you need one. Covid is not severe in Georgia. Hell, my friends who contracted Covid, were in the front yard raking leaves. I set their casseroles down in the driveway.
Erick, thanks for continuing to speak the truth. My wife, her parents and most of my co-workers believe a lot of the conspiracy theories and your posts gives me the information I need to show them that there is no there there. Sometimes I am successful and sometimes not. Fortunately for me, I have a group of guys from my church that I meet with every Friday morning that believe as I do. The thing I try to focus on is that know mattter what happens, GOD is still in control.
A couple simple questions? Why were the suitcases stored under the table (out of sight)? That same table-top was totally unused....why not were the suitcases stored on the table-top? Why were the suitcases (under the table) only removed after most of the observers were "sent" home. These are simple questions. There may be a perfectly reasonable explanation but your explanation sounds like it's coming from a person who just wants to sweep this under the rug as fast as possible. But, Erick, it just doesn't smell right. You know Erick, I got a little skeptical of you after I heard that "powder-puff" interview you had with the Sec of State Raffensberger....you gave him a complete pass on that one. "Facts" do matter to me....but I don't think it's quite over yet. We'll see
Thank You!
They have an affidavit from one of the watchers that said they were all told to leave and that she was upset to hear from someone at the venue said they were still working. It was mentioned in the beginning of the hearing.
Thanks Erick for clarifying what was going on that night. Just watching the video freaked me out but your explanation helped calm my fears. As a Georgia voter, I have been begging my friends to NOT watch or listen to any of this election coverage cuz we all need to focus on the runoff election! The thought of the Senate also in Democrat hands scares me. The Democrats are so full of hate for anything and anyone Trump, all the good Trump has done for the country will be trashed and I can't afford more Obama policies! Thanks for keeping me sane!
Enough has been exposed across the nation for me to conclude that Democrat leadership purposefully orchestrated a massive voter fraud campaign in swing states. The video you posted may or may not expose a particular incident of fraud, but in the aggregate across the nation the incidents brought to light are enough to nullify the election. I hold with the "fraud vitiates everything" Supreme Court precedent as applicable to this year's election. No do-over! Trump won by default!
Also, was the water leak part of the fraudulent plan?
If there were nefarious dealings observed by this monitor, why didn't she speak up at the time? Apparently, there were not.
In the video she asked why the ballots were under the table separate from the other ballots and pulled out when most people left. I would like to know. I’m not stuck on the election was stolen, but could you help me understand why the republicans let Stacy Abrahms register 800,000 new voters and not at least do the same thing? Who was asleep at the wheel ? Someone had to notice the newly registered Democrats right?
This is who Trump always was: an immoral man, willing to lie about any and all things to benefit himself, irrespective of the impact on others or the country. The man you supported for president.
I can't dispute your analysis of the video. This one makes no more sense to me than any of the others floating around. What I do dispute is the notion that too little wrongdoing was perpetrated to change the outcome. You cannot tell me that even if anything wrong happened, it was too little to matter. Wrongdoing is wrong, and it should be identified, punished, and prevented from happening in the future.
My point is that the election process should be known to us all. There should be no secrets about the way the election operates. People whose job is to observe what goes on should be as close to the process as they need to be in order to see what goes on. Everything that happens should be open to observation, and both the processors and the observers to the process should agree on what happened.
The problem is that unless we know that the process is completely visible and honest, we cannot know if some observed wrongdoing is an anomaly or a practice. As voters, we must be able to trust the process to record what voters actually voted. It is all a very complicated, expensive, unfunny joke if nobody can say with confidence, the voters chose this candidate.
I agree that it is possible that too little wrongdoing occurred to change the election outcome. However, any wrongdoing is still wrong, and until we chase it all to ground, we cannot know who was actually elected.
In essence, your argument seems to be that since insufficient signature verification was done (your words: "[the Georgia GOP] could have fought to observe the signature verification process; and they could have demanded to stay and observe that night, but they didn’t.") that is justification for not doing a signature audit now to independently verify its accuracy. That puts your position in opposition to Governor Kemp, Senators Loeffler and Perdue and Congressmen Collins. The purpose of an audit is to verify the truth and if the portion of the GA-GOP that you seem to seek to speak for is against doing that, then that portion of the GA-GOP stands in opposition to what the vast majority of the GOP seek (i.e. the truth). Trump's position is in line with Kemp, Loeffer, Perdue, and Collins, in arguing for all GOP members to vote for Loeffler/Perdue, but also do the signature verification audit: "The best way to insure a @KLoeffler and @sendavidperdue VICTORY is to allow signature checks in the Presidential race, which will insure a Georgia Presidential win (very few votes are needed, many will be found). Spirits will soar and everyone will rush out and VOTE!"
The way you find the truth about such matters is in unbiased courts of law that allow evidence to be presented and witnesses to testify and be cross examined. That is what responsible GOP members advocate for, with this procedure expressed in a set of Kurt Schlichter's tweets regarding the video: "Exactly. Videotape is a great type of evidence, but it is meaningless without getting the context through sworn testimony. We all want the truth. That’s how you find the truth. We shouldn’t be afraid of that. We should celebrate it. .. I want to see more facts about what this actually means, but this demonstrates why it is important to litigate these matters all the way to a final resolution. We must get the evidence out there. ... The same way you try and find the truth in any trial. You cross examine the witness. People lie all the time. I know - I’m a lawyer."
You may be willing to place your trust in Raffensperger, but quite a few people in the GOP would prefer an independent examination of the evidence to verify what the truth is. Isn't that what "Quid ed veritas" seeks? The quest to verify the truth has nothing at all to do with not voting for Loeffler and Perdue, as anybody who is truly a Trump supporter will clearly follow his guidance and vote GOP.
I will be voting at the Sandy Springs library December 14 at 7am. I urge you to do the same at your polling place. There is no need to vote by paper mail in ballot. No need at all. We have a vaccine, therapeutics can be given if you contract Covid, hospitalizations in Georgia are down, plenty of beds if you need one. Covid is not severe in Georgia. Hell, my friends who contracted Covid, were in the front yard raking leaves. I set their casseroles down in the driveway.
Erick, thanks for continuing to speak the truth. My wife, her parents and most of my co-workers believe a lot of the conspiracy theories and your posts gives me the information I need to show them that there is no there there. Sometimes I am successful and sometimes not. Fortunately for me, I have a group of guys from my church that I meet with every Friday morning that believe as I do. The thing I try to focus on is that know mattter what happens, GOD is still in control.