An out of context video featuring Ukraine’s President, Volodymyr Zelensky, quoted him claiming American sons and daughters will have to fight and die in Ukraine. Isolationists and pro-Russian propagandists all seized on the video to denounce American funding of Ukraine’s war effort. Understanding Zelensky’s statement in its context, he is right.
The context came from the preface, selectively edited out by social media warriors. He said if Ukraine loses, Russia will be emboldened to take on NATO member states. That would, in fact, force the United States into the war. Russian President Vladimir Putin has fully embraced the idea that his war in Ukraine is a proxy war against NATO. If he can beat Ukraine, he thinks he can beat NATO.
Putin has recently suggested reconsidering Latvia, Lithuania, and Estonia as sovereign nations and suggested Poland may be a threat Russia will have to deal with. All are NATO members. Should Russia invade them, the United States will have to respond.
The Russian propagandists claim the United States is to blame for the Russian invasion of Ukraine. They claim by considering admitting Ukraine into NATO, we provoked Russia to respond. The dimwits of history, unconcerned with truth, ignore the United States expressly rejected Ukraine’s admission to NATO. Our rejected thought is not what provoked Russia. They also ignore the United States and Russia jointly agreed to protect Ukraine’s sovereignty when it surrendered its former Soviet nuclear arsenal to Russia. We are keeping our word and Russia is breaking its word.
There is a bigger issue at stake here and it is why we should continue to support Ukraine. Ukraine is a proxy war in defense of the Western world order keeping something new and far more sinister than any Western post-colonial system at bay.
Russian sycophants and leftwing pundits rail against the Western order, Western rules, and colonialism. What they are really arguing against is the Western trade and diplomatic system. It is rules based. It is flawed, but generally has brought trade, peace, and a legal regime to a world of sovereign nations. Play by the rules and play in the system and countries can achieve peace and trade.
The Russians, Chinese, Iranians, and Brazilians who just welcomed Iran’s Navy to its ports, want to end the Western order. Their system, playing out across Asia, Africa, and parts of South America is might makes right. Powerful nations use their force, surreptitiousness, and bribes to get what they want. The system is unfair, ruthless, and dependent on corruption. This is the system reflective in those nations.
The United States and Europe put the Western system in place to fight corruption, the idea that military superpowers could impose their will on others through surreptitious means, and provided a meaningful path for business to flourish without bribes, money laundering, and other bad practices.
China and Iran are helping Russia in Ukraine, hoping to destabilize the Western world order. A victory would suggest to Middle Eastern powers that they should ally with and gave more favorable oil deals to China at our expense. The Eastern calculation is that the West is tired and weak.
Some on the right, because of cultural concerns, have embraced and champion this. They seem to think they would be spared from the wokes if Russia and China were dominant. Putin played into that belief last week with a speech in which he attacked Western cultural progressivism. Some on the left, because of economic and cultural concerns, also embrace and champion this. The NBA profits from China while lecturing the United States on social justice. The left believes the Chinese economic system is more equitable than our own. Both those on the left and right who flirt with this realignment are playing with fire.
The isolations too are playing with fire. Each time the United States has looked inward and ignored its role on the world state, it has then had to grapple with world war. Isolations claim to reject this idea, but they reject history in so doing. The United States must support Ukraine because it must defend the Western order. To show weakness in Ukraine is to signal weakness to Russia and China. That is just reality, like it or not.
I still haven't seen or heard a single person who is pro Putin or a Russian propagandist. All I have seen is people wanting accountability for money being sent to a corrupt foreign country and protections for our own borders. I am not fond of this "if you don't agree to send billions to Ukraine, with no accounting for how it is spent, you are pro Putin" argument.
Seeing people that question the American instinct to pursue violence and fight global wars being labeled isolationist always bothers me. It is entirely possible to want an engaged foreign policy while also believing the US should play less of a role in global conflict. Having spent 15 years of my life fighting our wars overseas, I would love to see an America that doesn't seem addicted to violence domestically and overseas.
How does blowing up 3 of the 4 Nordstream pipelines fit into this comversation?