Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Israel Bigelow's avatar

For a very long time, Republicans had a unifying ideology from the Reagan era. Today, the politics have changed, and those ideas have been replaced by a political coalition loyal to Donald Trump. The phenomenon that Erick brilliantly captures is that the negotiations in the House are very complicated. I myself think both Johnson's and Roy's approaches have merit. The deciding factor for which too many Republicans decide complicated questions now is whether or not Trump supports it. The irony is that by all available evidence Trump is not playing 4-D chess. In this case, he was swayed by his buddy Elon tweeting about Johnson's bill.

Setting the sheep aside, House Republicans have become too dysfunctional as a result of both the double dealing and big spending from the Speaker and the radicals undermining Republican leadership for their own gain. Trump will need to unify the two sides if he is to tackle the most pressing problems heading into his administration, securing the border and expiring tax cuts. Perhaps it is better that the conflict between Johnson and Roy happen now rather than later when legislation with actual stakes is on the line. Maybe a little bit of dysfunction is the cost of holding together a coalition that achieve larger goals. The largest goal is shrinking the size of government and cutting government spending. In order to achieve it, the GOP will have to show they can govern and tackle legislation on the issues that won Trump election, or they will be swept from power without shrinking anything.

Expand full comment
ChazAtl's avatar

Mike Johnson is a means to an end. He’s not Paul Ryan or John B. But he’s close to it.

For the sake of getting things done we needed to let him be speaker and move on.

The truth is we don’t have the majority to put a true staunch conservative as speaker. It’s not going to happen.

BUT every house needs one.

So you either get a Jeffries, which is unacceptable in my opinion, or you get Johnson who is the polar opposite of him.

That’s all I got to say.

Saying that there no need to bash trump supporters on your blogs. Without them we would have Kamala Harris. Without the overwhelming distrust of the media and Elon musk. We would still have the blue sky version of twitter.

You need to do what I did over the holidays and watch summary videos of election night and the leftists meltdowns. That no matter what is said or done. A Trump being in the white house is remarkably better than what we could have had.

Expand full comment
105 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?