The New York Times is blatantly misreporting basic facts on Federal Judge Doughty's ruling based of one case: Covid-19 vaccines do not prevent transmission of the disease.’” If I may, if everyone who was getting the vaccine read the original pamphlet for the Moderna Vaccine, it states in black and white: This vaccine does NOT PREVENT COV…
The New York Times is blatantly misreporting basic facts on Federal Judge Doughty's ruling based of one case: Covid-19 vaccines do not prevent transmission of the disease.’” If I may, if everyone who was getting the vaccine read the original pamphlet for the Moderna Vaccine, it states in black and white: This vaccine does NOT PREVENT COVID. In the current pamphlet is makes one statement that everyone should be aware of: Postmarketing data demonstrate increased risks of myocarditis and pericarditis, particularly within 7 days following the second dose. Risk is higher among males under 40. If people read the pamphlets that are included with the shots they are getting, they might say, "Why bother or why take the chance?"
The New York Times is blatantly misreporting basic facts on Federal Judge Doughty's ruling based of one case: Covid-19 vaccines do not prevent transmission of the disease.’” If I may, if everyone who was getting the vaccine read the original pamphlet for the Moderna Vaccine, it states in black and white: This vaccine does NOT PREVENT COVID. In the current pamphlet is makes one statement that everyone should be aware of: Postmarketing data demonstrate increased risks of myocarditis and pericarditis, particularly within 7 days following the second dose. Risk is higher among males under 40. If people read the pamphlets that are included with the shots they are getting, they might say, "Why bother or why take the chance?"