Thanks Erick for posting NY Post article about the Delta plane tire incident. Unfortunately, I clicked on an ad for ED thinking it was more on the story. $49.99 and I think my troubles will soon be over!!! LOL.
Wow the Smithsonian went down the rabbit hole and pulled the cover shut! Unbelievable, is there no place of learning safe or even left from this idiocy and politics?
Heard your rant on how terrible both candidates are and totally agree. Totally agree about Kamala and dems and totally agree on much of what you said on Trump.
Question for you though - Why are you not willing to acknowledge Trump's lawlessness and multiple illegal attempts to stay in power after losing an election? Is this a bridge too far for you / your listeners to admit you are going to vote for someone that took serious steps to try to end democracy? Do you not believe it? You are willing to say a bunch of other terrible but true things about him that will undoubtedly offend much of your audience anyway so what's the reluctance to touch this subject?
Right after the election there were stories of vote fraud. I believe Ted Cruz and others wanted an investigation of these charges. The Democrats didn't.
I don’t trust either party so a fair election is necessary. How can it be fair if accusations weren’t investigated?
There were a lot of investigations and recounts in many states and counties and they all turned up bupkis. Trump and his supporters were not looking for objective outcomes, only to appease his ego with claims of fraud.
Apparently, you don’t routinely read Erick’s substack or listen to his radio program. He has often criticized Trump’s efforts to stay in power after the 2020 election and has condemned the January 6th rebellion.
admittedly, I wasn't a listener at the time, but have been on and off for the past couple of years. I have regularly read his substack for over a year and have never seen him mention that Trump made multiple illegal attempts to stay in power after losing an election. He has been critical of Trump multiple times especially in the primary season when he clearly wanted anyone but Trump to prevail, but his criticism alway had to do with policy position, electability, discipline, morality, obnoxiousness, etc. I have never seen him note the most important aspect of why it needed to be anyone but Trump.
In criticizing the idiots on January 6th, Erick made a number of listeners angry (on more than one occasion) by saying the young lady who was shot and killed by the Capitol Hill policeman deserved it because she was illegally trying to break into the Capitol. I’m guessing he made those comments before you were a listener, but he has indeed said this and made other criticisms of what Trump did after the 2020 election. He has also said that the strongest legal case against Trump is the documents case because Trump ignored the request to turn over missing documents. On a personal note, while I understand Erick’s decision to support Trump because he fears an extremely left-leaning Harris presidency, I can’t vote for Trump so am choosing to vote for “none of the above.”
You are on fire today, Erick. Your 1 o'clock monologue was magnificent. Thank you. I will be relistening to that as soon as it is uploaded, and probably more than once. Well done, sir. Well done.
"An anonymous staffer on the Kamala Harris team...." So once again its an anonymous staffer not Harris herself. She wont be able to do this forever, and its why she doesn't want to debate. If she goes this route and dodges the media forever, its going to cost her the election which I don't mind one bit.
"More than 200 Bush, McCain, Romney alums endorse Harris for president, criticize Trump ". You know, if I had enough money where inflation did not effect my standard of living, enough where my house payment did not force me to scrape by once a month, or utilities did not make me cringe every time I had to pay the water or power bill, I could live the life and vote left because their policies where hurting me nor my family. Well, I don't have a large bank account. I save as much as possible to just get by and the policies of the left hurt me. When I read how X or Y does not like Trump and believe his policies will hurt the US, I place that person in the group of people with enough money that Kamala will not hurt them too bad. I don't care for Trump but I had more money in my pocket when he was president versus now. I believe Kamala will be another Joe Biden, claim to be a moderate and on day 1 of swearing in vear hard left and take America down the toilet in the name of Progressive Social Justice.
"Zuckerberg says he regrets caving to White House pressure on content " and he pinky promises not to do that again, at least for another month... to save Democracy.
Newsflash. Apparently the Dems are using "Strength thru Joy" as a campaign focus.
WOW...the biggest screw up in political history. Google it up and you will see this logo was first adapted by the NAZI party in 1933.
O M G
Border Security - sometime google Boarder Fences and walls of other countries.
Our border is a joke. inadequate, and a DANGER to our security.
Yes - govt employees and the other establishment $ getters are afraid Trump will make them Work.
Thanks Erick for posting NY Post article about the Delta plane tire incident. Unfortunately, I clicked on an ad for ED thinking it was more on the story. $49.99 and I think my troubles will soon be over!!! LOL.
“ ‘White Fragility’ author Robin DiAngelo accused of plagiarizing minority scholars in Ph.D thesis”
Schadenfreude
Wow the Smithsonian went down the rabbit hole and pulled the cover shut! Unbelievable, is there no place of learning safe or even left from this idiocy and politics?
“No one has ever won an election based on what they’ve done.”
I know you’ve heard of U. S. Grant and D. D. Eisenhower. Both decent to good Presidents, but elected based on their past deeds.
Heard your rant on how terrible both candidates are and totally agree. Totally agree about Kamala and dems and totally agree on much of what you said on Trump.
Question for you though - Why are you not willing to acknowledge Trump's lawlessness and multiple illegal attempts to stay in power after losing an election? Is this a bridge too far for you / your listeners to admit you are going to vote for someone that took serious steps to try to end democracy? Do you not believe it? You are willing to say a bunch of other terrible but true things about him that will undoubtedly offend much of your audience anyway so what's the reluctance to touch this subject?
Right after the election there were stories of vote fraud. I believe Ted Cruz and others wanted an investigation of these charges. The Democrats didn't.
I don’t trust either party so a fair election is necessary. How can it be fair if accusations weren’t investigated?
There were a lot of investigations and recounts in many states and counties and they all turned up bupkis. Trump and his supporters were not looking for objective outcomes, only to appease his ego with claims of fraud.
Apparently, you don’t routinely read Erick’s substack or listen to his radio program. He has often criticized Trump’s efforts to stay in power after the 2020 election and has condemned the January 6th rebellion.
admittedly, I wasn't a listener at the time, but have been on and off for the past couple of years. I have regularly read his substack for over a year and have never seen him mention that Trump made multiple illegal attempts to stay in power after losing an election. He has been critical of Trump multiple times especially in the primary season when he clearly wanted anyone but Trump to prevail, but his criticism alway had to do with policy position, electability, discipline, morality, obnoxiousness, etc. I have never seen him note the most important aspect of why it needed to be anyone but Trump.
In criticizing the idiots on January 6th, Erick made a number of listeners angry (on more than one occasion) by saying the young lady who was shot and killed by the Capitol Hill policeman deserved it because she was illegally trying to break into the Capitol. I’m guessing he made those comments before you were a listener, but he has indeed said this and made other criticisms of what Trump did after the 2020 election. He has also said that the strongest legal case against Trump is the documents case because Trump ignored the request to turn over missing documents. On a personal note, while I understand Erick’s decision to support Trump because he fears an extremely left-leaning Harris presidency, I can’t vote for Trump so am choosing to vote for “none of the above.”
You are on fire today, Erick. Your 1 o'clock monologue was magnificent. Thank you. I will be relistening to that as soon as it is uploaded, and probably more than once. Well done, sir. Well done.
"An anonymous staffer on the Kamala Harris team...." So once again its an anonymous staffer not Harris herself. She wont be able to do this forever, and its why she doesn't want to debate. If she goes this route and dodges the media forever, its going to cost her the election which I don't mind one bit.
"More than 200 Bush, McCain, Romney alums endorse Harris for president, criticize Trump ". You know, if I had enough money where inflation did not effect my standard of living, enough where my house payment did not force me to scrape by once a month, or utilities did not make me cringe every time I had to pay the water or power bill, I could live the life and vote left because their policies where hurting me nor my family. Well, I don't have a large bank account. I save as much as possible to just get by and the policies of the left hurt me. When I read how X or Y does not like Trump and believe his policies will hurt the US, I place that person in the group of people with enough money that Kamala will not hurt them too bad. I don't care for Trump but I had more money in my pocket when he was president versus now. I believe Kamala will be another Joe Biden, claim to be a moderate and on day 1 of swearing in vear hard left and take America down the toilet in the name of Progressive Social Justice.
"Zuckerberg says he regrets caving to White House pressure on content " and he pinky promises not to do that again, at least for another month... to save Democracy.