Contrarianism has run amok in the United States. It is a byproduct of moving into post-modernity. Instead of focusing on what is true, we now all focus on our personal truths with no regard to if it is actually true. If we believe it is true, then by God in Heaven it is true!
Combine that with our increasing divisions as a society and many people’s truth is now based on being exactly opposite their opposing tribe. Everyone prides themselves on their individual thought and really their thoughts are not individual but based on tribal consent. No one actually sees it that way, but it is actually that way. People gauge what they think is true based on what everyone else in their tribe says is true and they decide they too have, independently and uniquely, arrived at the exact same conclusion of what is true.
Each person, a master of his own destiny, does not even realize he is in a herd. One could reasonably conclude that if buffalo or lemmings could speak, each one would claim it chose to go in that direction all by themselves — the direction that literally every member of the herd is going. There is, after all, safety in numbers and if everyone else in the herd is headed in a direction, you will probably head that way too.
The United States is now fairly evenly divided and no one trusts institutions. The media has destroyed its own credibility. The bureaucracy can be bullied by special interests. People are too cynical to trust politicians. So they trust their friends and a community that each has increasingly built online or through political interaction to look and think just like themselves. The result is now a handful of groups that claim independent thought, expert input, political power at different levels, and remarkably stake out positions to be exactly opposite the other.
The actual independent thinker tends to be increasingly isolated and, as everyone wants to belong to a community, often must make compromises to fit in. But most people do not want to ride in turbulent seas so they go along to get along within their tribe. That is an important distinction because there are those, on both sides of the political aisle, who rock the boat. If your tribe is committed to rocking the boat, calm seas is your turbulence.
Unfortunately for the country, this has left us largely without good ideas and sound public policy. Each tribe wishes to be contrary to the other tribe. Not too long ago, if one of America’s political tribes staked out position X, the other tribe most assuredly would stake out X+1 or Y. In other words, they would call for something more fully than the other side or different from the other side claiming their different way was a better way.
Now, each side has chosen to be an opposite. Instead of pushing Y to challenge X, the opposing tribe pushes -X, the exact opposite. One side has embraced vaccines, so the other side refuses to get them. When Donald Trump was President of the United States, Democrats cast doubt and aspersions on the vaccine and operation warp speed. As soon as Joe Biden became President, Trump supporters became the loudest skeptics of the vaccine.
As Republicans showed sound science that children are not the spreaders of COVID and should be able to go to school without masks, Democrats rushed to do the exact opposite and insist on masks for children even outside. What one side advocates, the other side must do the exact opposite. There can be no nuance and damn the person who charts a middle path or an alternate path.
This will not last. X+-X equals X-X, which equals zero. Both sides cancel each other out. It is basic math. The side that ultimately wins is going to be the side that charts a different path, not a contrary path. We need some alternatives now. Both sides seem to be out of any idea except whatever one side is for, the other is against. That provides no path forward for any of us.
This reminds me ofbthe old Monty Python skit called, "The Argument Clinic."
No matter what the person says, the other person automatically disagrees.
I take issue with any notion that our two political tribes have been equally “contrarian.” While trust in institutions may have eroded generally, this is much truer for Republicans than Democrats. For example, even when it was a part of the Trump administration, few Democrats questioned the guidance coming out of the Center for Disease Control. (What they questioned was the guidance coming out of Trump.)
When Democrats “gauge what they think is true,” it has not just been based on what everyone else in their tribe thinks; it also tends to be consistent with the advice coming out of institutions possessing expertise in the matter. Meanwhile, many of today’s Republicans seem to reject the very notion of expertise. (If I hear another right-wing talk show host refer to someone as being “over-educated,” I think my head just might explode.)
Illustrating my point, though it may have been true regarding Operation Warp Speed, Democrats never “cast doubt and aspersions on the vaccine” when Trump was President, if only because the vaccines didn’t even exist until he was on his way out of office. Democratic skepticism concerning Operation Warp Speed was consistent with a much longer historical timeline for the development of vaccines, as described by people with expertise in the field.
All this betrays the true pattern of “contrarianism” in this country: (1) experts (institutional or otherwise) take a position on an issue, (2) Democrats coalesce behind it, and then (3) Republicans oppose it. That said, I do not believe contrarianism to be an inherently Republican trait. It is being driven by politicians and media figures in the conservative movement who either put winning by whatever means above any considerations of good public policy, or who lack the spine to oppose that which they know to be bad policy if it is being pursued by those in their tribe.