2 Comments
⭠ Return to thread

This is off topic but my wife was watching PBS last night and they had a Frontline piece on Clarence Thomas so I decided to watch, more out of curiosity. At first, it dragged you in with sympathy for his upbringing and his empathy for the Black Power movement in college. By the mid-way point, I could tell where they were going with it. By the end, my suspicions were confirmed when they questioned whether the SC could be increasingly seen as illegitimate because of Clarence Thomas, whom they basically said was now the true power on the court. They even had the ProPublica journalist on who wrote the recent hit piece and almost every other interviewee they had, especially those who did not know him personally, were dripping with absolute disdain as they spoke. Why are we (taxpayers) paying for this crap? They are attempting a full court press to make sure the court is not seen with any relevance whatsoever.

Expand full comment

They only care about power. Getting Thomas to resign allows the regime to appoint a liberal. They could care less about any possible ethics problems. The same with George Santos. The dems don't care a bit about anything he did. They only care that he is a Republican and gives McCarthy a slight edge to hold them accountable for their actions.

Expand full comment