6 Comments

Re: SPLC Researcher Who Labeled 'Moms for Liberty' a Hate Group Met Biden National Security Officials... The SPLC was started in 1971 by a group of lawyers, headed up by Morris Dees (a guy who is accused of molesting his stepdaughter). While they fought for Civil Rights, it quickly turned into a revenue stream for these guys to get rich… and hoo boy, did they ever get rich. The SPLC has assets totaling over $450 million, with Dees having taken millions for himself over the decades. It’s nothing but an organization of professional grifters… it’s all about getting paid…. But they’re propped up by the media and seem to have a lock on being legitimate in left-wing circles. The reason that BLM failed is because its founder, Patrisse Cullors, was just an amateur grifter… she got too greedy too quickly and bought too many large mansions. Otherwise, the SPLC is just one big massive scam.

Expand full comment

It is so clear that any indictment of Trump is a pure misdirection play to avert attention from a highly corrupt Biden administration and their agency lackeys. One would have to be an idiot to think otherwise.

Expand full comment

Keep going after Trump for storing classified document while excusing Biden and keep adding to the proof of Democrat ruling class abuses of power. This stuff just strengthens my support of the man. He has been right about everything and every day it gets stronger proof.

Expand full comment

You mention Mitch McConnell being the most unpopular politician. I think he’s the only one hated both for being too effective (by the left) and not MAGA enough by Trumpists.

Expand full comment

The sad thing about Cuba, besides being a cesspit of despair and ally of our enemies, is that the whole thing could have been stopped 62 years ago at the Bay of Pigs. New President Kennedy completely botched the effort by Cuban patriots, giving them just enough support to insure they’d fail.

Expand full comment

Speaking of indictments: https://jdrucker.substack.com/p/if-rumors-are-true-about-mike-pence

I have no way of defending nor refuting the "he said she said" claims of Drucker's source. However, we must never lose sight of the fact that one person had the Constitutional authority to delay certification of the presidential election until all legitimate challenges were reviewed and adjudicated. GOP Congresspersons offered at least two such challenges, on behalf of their states. Mr. Pence opted to rush ahead (in concert with Madame Pelosi) and certify before that day's time limit expired.

As a result, we have endured nearly three years of accusations of vote fraud, most of which could have been put to bed prior to certification had Mr. Pence opted to do so. The never-Trump folks here would have benefited, as if those challenges went nowhere, Trump's "election theft" argument would have died then and there.

Expand full comment