33 Comments

Those that are screaming, "there is no evidence for vote fraud!" and those that are screaming "there is tons of evidence!" are both wrong. The Trump team is in the process of gathering evidence to be used in court. I suggest everyone step back and take a breath. There is no sense to staying upset and angry till this plays out. President Trump has until Jan 20, 2021, to present enough evidence to the courts to either change the results or not. After the way Donald Trump has been horribly treated since he announced his campaign for president June 2015, he has earned that right to contest the election. I hope and pray that it is settled by Jan. 20, because if it is not, the speaker of the house, Nancy Pelosi assumes presidential duties until things are worked out. God help us!

Expand full comment

I am sorry but without evidence the Trump team shouldn’t be claiming fraud. You don’t scream fraud after you lose and then look for the evidence

. Furthermore if he had evidence during the election he controlled the justice department and should have stopped it. It was his constitutional duty.

And all this time is hurting the transition. You know we are in a pandemic and the new President has to prepare. This is about far more than Donald Trump.

He was deliberately dishonest when he told his voters he won on election night when he knew there were millions of legal ballots that needed to be counted. Millions that arrived in time.

I have no doubts there are irregularities probably though on both sides but once you start going down this road you open Pandora’s box. This President needs to present his evidence now or concede.

We settle our decisions on who leads us in the ballot box. Not the courts. Joe Biden got over four million more votes and counting. The “courts make him President.” You will have people taking to the streets.

I voted for this President I deeply regret it.

Expand full comment

It may be too late for Trump in this election, but in my experience, someone always talks. If there was fraud in this election, it will eventually come out, possibly in a year or two. If someone helped with a successful coup this big, people just cannot keep quiet about it. Then, if they are arrested and realize they will serve a hefty prison term while their bosses stay free, they will testify. Unless, they fall victim to the clinton method of getting rid of witnesses. If a bunch of people who worked for the Biden backers suddenly start committing suicide, it would be a telling sign.

P.S. I hope people realize that I am only half serious with this post. Just trying to introduce some levity to a serious subject. We will survive. I am starting to get back my sense of humor after the downer on nov.4. Also my wife showed me a post on facebook that said Over 70 million republicans are mad as hell at the election results and there are 0 riots in the streets.

Expand full comment

Erick, I disagree with a lot of things. First, what did impeachment get them? There are a great number of unwashed who have fallen in line. I know of multiple people who truly believe the Russian hoax.

This gets to freedom of the press. Expressly the right to lie w/ impunity. The left chooses their experts, their witnesses say one thing under oath but are free to lie their asses off in other venues to the point of where no-one gives a damn once the truth comes out. If any prior administration stooge knew that they'd be held accountable for their lies, they would freaking have shut the hell up.

I hope everyone recognizes the fact that a HUGE part of people liking Trump was that he did not cave to this nonsense. So the question is what will the republicans do in light of this? Will they fix anything or revert to their milquetoast ways. A wrong answer aligns it to be the Trump party from here forward. Right now there has been a re-alignment of the party. I agree with Erick there, but the republican fools in charge will think people agree with their slow walk to failure mentality. This will lead to the foretold disaster in the next election.

Expand full comment

Now that I have calmed down after your somewhat gleeful announcement nov.4 that Trump lost, I can reply respectfully instead of like a rabid leftist. I will accept the results of this election IF, each state AG certifies that biden won, so they are subject to arrest and imprisonment if voter fraud is proven in their states. My main concern is that people accepted the positive changes over the past 4 years and do not want to give Trump any credit. Trump is the one who brought in new black and hispanic voters and people who never voted, not the republican party, which gave Trump very little support. Trump helped us keep the senate and pick up house seats. All the positive changes were fought for by Trump. Republican voters have become used to winning with Trump. If the the party puts forward a more "acceptable" candidate next time like Mark o Rubio, Nickey Haley, low energy Jeb or any other "lose with honor republican", they will be rejected. We are used to someone who will fight for us. You say you are a republican, but it seems to be of the "lose with honor" type. But a loser nontheless.

Expand full comment

I said many of the same things this morning. Trump's abrasive personality and his inability to maintain any form of self-control drove voters to Biden as the lesser offensive between two old white lecherous men. However, those same voters demonstrated their fatigue with pushy progressive Pelosi policies. I think this may be a good thing for the country if everyone would drop the conspiracy theories and pick up the work.

Expand full comment

I especially appreciate that you avoid sarcasm.

Expand full comment

Erick, in regard to your comments on the media, I once worked for a Canadian based company, so I watched their government run news station CN when I was in Canada. If the bias in the US eventually gets so bad, could we surrender the freedom of the press to a similar state? I know that this would be extreme and unlikely, but we are not getting any news or truth and I believe that most Americans want it.

Expand full comment

I do not want state controlled media

Expand full comment

Either do I.

Expand full comment

I'm really over your prognostications Erick. Roy Moore was the best candidate in Alabama--a Godly man you said. So now, I'm no where near confident you assertions that the GOP will have a Senate as a stop are true: Perdue and Loeffler will cruise to victory in Jan? Really? Love him or not Trump was the megaphone of the GOP. He wasn't afraid to get dirty and call names in a way work-a-day voters got. You think Marco Rubio will do that? Cruz? No. Right now I pray that Trump resurfaces for 2024.

Expand full comment

I mean Biden won the Presidency because he acts like an adult. That’s literally why and people like him in a way they didn’t like Hillary. He couldn’t even win the popular vote against Hillary

Expand full comment

Biden can't find his way out of a wet paper bag and will not make it 4 years. Harris will be pulling the strings along with Pelosi and the radical left but hopefully they won't get anywhere.

Expand full comment

About the only thing any if us can do, and hopefully agree in, is get money and time to pull the Georgia candidates into the Senate. I am not optimistic about it. Just look at the voter turnout in Savannah. Absurd levels.

Expand full comment

It's fun to make fun of biden, but he's been doing this 47 years. He knows the buracracy. Just regulations from him will suck. All the never trumpers are going to remember what it's like to have a Dem in office

Expand full comment

You may be correct if the lost suburb votes (read women) is just a one off thing and will come back to the GOP. I doubt it. Again, Erick seems very polly-anna in his belief that the GOP will control the Senate. They are not now, and I'm skeptical of Georgia's runoff. Watch the narrative: GOP has a problem and this election showed it as they lost the suburbs in Georgia and Arizona. NEGATIVE. The problem with the GOP is they are not embracing populism.

Expand full comment

I am a woman and live in the 'burbs. I voted Trump.

Expand full comment

I am sorry but really another Republican would have won 2016 and relection. Trump yelling polarizes a lot and you think the answer is Trump again seriously?

Expand full comment

He brought more people into the GOP than before. More than Romney (a "nice man") more than McCain (a "nice man") Now we should all the "principled conservatives" like Romney and George Will to come back into the fold? Nuts to that.

Expand full comment

If he ran against Obama he would have lost like Mitt. A lot of people regretted not voting for Mitt..He also turns off a lot of voters. I think Mitt could have beaten Hillary. She was unlikeable. Trump yes has a lot of supporters but his style also turns of a lot of the voters and he lost the popular vote both times by millions. Don’t you think that matters? I cannot stand that man and I reluctantly voted for him but based on his actions now I wish I had gone third party. He acts like a spoiled child and we need grown ups in the White House. A more stately Republican would have won relection.

Expand full comment

So it's preferable to vote for someone like Biden rather than someone who is "bombastic?" What about actual work and policies? Biden has done nothing in 47 yrs. He now will be the Torjan horse for increasingly leftist and progressive policies, the loss of Constitutional Rights , increases in taxes for those who work and more.

Expand full comment

Most any republican would not have won michigan or penn against Hillary. Look my focus now is on the senate. Trump us toast. My argument is that the coalition that put biden in is going to be ready. I do not share Ericka belief that this election was a victory.

Expand full comment

You don’t know that. Trump lost a lot of votes in 2016. I know a lot of people who voted third party in 2016 who typically vote Republican. A lot. Trumps brand of politics appeals to a few But also turns of a lot. And conservative justices lowering taxes are all stuff any Republican would have done. Criminal justice and fair trade is stuff Republicans should keep. But they can keep without Trump and his meanness.

Expand full comment

I am sorry but you can have policies and not be mean you accomplish nothing making fun of people. It’s irresponsible to make fun of masks during a pandemic. I know plenty of reluctant Trump voters who only voted pro life but wish they could have voted for someone else.

Expand full comment

To a previous post I asked, "Can you separate the message from the messenger? I'll ask again, is there anyone out there in the GOP that can (or will) take the baton/message from Trump and run with it? Is there anyone that can generate these enthusiasm & loyalty that Trump has? Or will the Dems' plans simply be delayed till 2024 at the latest?

Expand full comment

There you have it, the silver lining for a very black cloud. I surly do hope you are right about the senate. The way things are going I'm not so sure. What ever happened to fair and honest elections. Are the democrats so power hungry that they are willing to walk over the American people to get to where they want to be. Don't they still work for us? If nothing else, please we need to implement term limits.

Expand full comment

It doesn't matter whether anybody is glad to take the results. Unless recounts can flip the very close elections or unless Trump's legal team can prove some massive fraud in courts, they will be certified. Nevertheless, I disagree with Erick's assessment that this election is good news. The Republican organizations that voted for Biden but for House/Senate Republicans made it known in advance they did not want either Trump or Trump's policies to control the GOP. But that means these Republicans neither wanted the message or the messenger, but a third option.

This group doesn't want Democrats to control the power of the government because the new masters of the country in 2024 who have a different message than Trump. Michael Steele's and the Bulwark crowd have pretty much said exactly that. However the reason Trump got a ton of Democrats among his 69.65 M-voters is his policies and if his policies go way with the allegedly new 2024-GOP message, so do a good many of his voters. If one believes Trump's policies that expanding the Republican base to include common working people was the goal, which Erick recently said he supports, this is not good news.

In my opinion, Erick gives far too little emphasis to the danger of giving Democrats control of the government. The Democrats still control the House and at most are a few seats from controlling the Senate. The next election is only 2 years away and the billionaire Democrats have proven that they are willing to put in boatloads of money to try to buy elections even for losing causes. All they need is a few close Senate races that they can flip with huge amounts of ad-dollars and unless Trump continues in politics, there will be no big rallies to bring in a record number of GOP voters.

The Democrats are still seething inside that the Tea Party stopped Obama's agenda cold in 2010 except for EO-power, which Biden will now undoubtedly use to restore all Obama era EO's and Presidential-policies (putting back regulations that Trump removed and reentering Paris Climate Accord and the Iran Nuke Deal). Biden has already said he would do all these things and you can bet he will keep these promises, but not the fracking one (goodbye pipeline approval).

Our country is still hanging on the edge of a socialist disaster, and the Democrats now control 2 of the 3 branches to implement it and they are only a few Senators away from hitting a Trifecta in 2022. Like the Tea Party, Trump had the nerve and the desire to stop their complete takeover. It remains to be seen if the House/Senate will follow the path of Trump to try to keep his voters or if they will follow the Republicans who want to change the GOP agenda back to the losing strategy of the final years of the Bush administration.

Expand full comment

They will comtrol the WH, and (hopefully) only half of Congress. The Judicial branch (including the SCOTUS) is hopefully out of reach for at least 10 years. Mitch's laser-like focus on filling judicial vacancies should help stymie much of the Far-Left's agenda.

Expand full comment

The WH is big - that is my point. The power to issue EO's and have government agencies issue regulations belongs to the Dem's if Biden wins, instead of being in GOP hands for another 4 years. As a minimum, the Dems will surely exercise that power. The power to veto legislation now belongs to the Dems, and if the Dems ever get control of the Senate, they have clearly stated they will eliminate the filibuster, pack the courts, and the Judicial Branch will again be in their control. In addition, the Dems have clearly stated that they will give DC two Senators, and if they first pack the courts, they will rule that constitutional, even though it is not. The only argument against all these possibilities is that the Democrats won't do what they have if/when they have the power to do so. But the Dem's twisted arms to get Obamacare through on Dem-only votes and to vote unanimously against Kavanaugh/Barrett when it mattered. I believe they will twist arms to get the filibuster through, pack the courts, and increase the Senate size as soon as they have the chance. Erick thinks they would not do this. But you can decide for yourself how infallible Erick's political views are and compare them to what happens if my scenario is more accurate.

Expand full comment

Clybourne won Biden the Presidency. His you all know Joe Biden was what did. You really cannot make him a Socialist. I think in general people generally trust Biden. It’s sort of telling that Conservatives greatest fear is Biden being replaced. I am pro life and didn’t vote for Biden but I do think Biden might be able to reduce some tensions. Go less drama the American public isn’t wrong

Expand full comment

"For years now, the Democrats and media have echoed each other that the GOP was a dwindling party of Southern and Rust Belt regionalism."

For those interested in how demographics are really changing, I'd recommend Eric Kaufmann's "Shall the Religious Inherit the Earth?" Kaufmann is a secular liberal from England and his book is an in depth look at how conservative religious faiths are growing in population due to their fertility advantage. He (regrettably in his opinion)foresees the secularization of western democracies ending by 2050 and largely reversing by the end of the century. Spoiler alert: Kaufmann ends by saying that yes, the religious will inherit the earth.

Expand full comment

All of what you report about Republican gains in Congress and the Courts is good news, Erick, as long as Trump is gone. Now we can get back to fulfilling truth, justice and the American way.

Expand full comment

Sorry to be so slow in subscribing! Great Success to you. A man of reason who can admit mistakes. What a wonderful combination you are. I share your thoughts often once or twice a week with friends, family, etc. My apologies for not subscribing sooner. Keep up the excellent work my friend.

Expand full comment